The image of the unscrupulous, lowbrow hunter is not hard to conjure in our minds. One can almost hear the familiar voice of a certain world-famous, cartoon simpleton hunting ‘wabbits’. It doesn’t require an anti-hunting organization or the mainstream media to perpetuate this character either. Sadly, all one needs to do is peek into the pool of broader hunting culture to find him. The reality is that some hunters don’t share the same commitment to fair chase hunting, meaningful conservation, and the respectful treatment of the land and all that is in it that a growing number of us embrace.
Instead of attempting to hide this ugly side of hunting culture, we, as hunter-conservationists, have the job of combating the bad apples while simultaneously promoting the good actions of responsible hunting and outdoorsmanship. This is done for the sake of our reputation to the broader non-hunting culture, but we also want to work to see the unacceptable practices within our community changed for the betterment of our consciences, wildlife, and the land we live on!
Poor communication with non-hunters by the broader hunting media has been a decades-long dilemma. Alongside that reality (and potentially connected to it), the difficulty of retention and recruitment of new hunters is one of the biggest challenges for modern outdoorsmen and women. I don’t expect to solve these issues with a single article from a non-expert hunter attempting non-expert philosophy. I do, on the other hand, hope to add a new tool to the arsenal of hunter-conservationists. This is where we turn to a classic triad borrowed from the worlds of theology and philosophy; truth, beauty, and goodness and their interrelation.
This tool I’m seeking to introduce is not really a new one, but it is a tool that seems to be ignored or forgotten. Without going into a robust history of how these concepts developed, I hope it will suffice to say that this triad has its roots in Platonic philosophy and features prominently in Christian theology. It has an important place as a tool for us since these worldviews have had such a prominent place in laying the foundations of western ideology; the ideology that spawned the North American model of conservation. In light of this ancient triad having a rich history in the cultures we are most familiar with, I offer a few illustrations of how it might be used and how we might communicate better with others when we use it correctly.

Truth
While hunting and hunting media may be beautiful and it may be good, that doesn’t guarantee that it is true.
The subject of truth could be taken many ways, but I want to look at one possible interpretation for the outdoor enthusiast; which is truthfulness or stated simply, honesty. Hunters need to stick to fact as best we can. Throwing out numbers and statistics when they are convenient to your point, and not dealing with them when they aren’t favorable will quickly get you labelled as ignorant, at best, and a liar, at worst. Frankly, my advice is to avoid using numbers you aren’t sure about. For many people, the issue is likely emotional anyway. We could accomplish a lot more as a community if we have calm conversations with people that know our character rather than expend energy as keyboard warriors throwing out stats.
No one is asking for perfection here, but communication of our arguments beyond purely anecdotal evidence or convenient numbers may go a long way in demonstrating our commitment to truth. This requires us to be up-to-date on current science. It requires us to read, and to encourage reading in others who don’t. It means supporting outlets that provide sound information. It requires us to stay up to date with our local wildlife and land management experts.
People’s minds change by the exchange of ideas, but if we undercut the facts with half truths and lies, we will push more people away. If the hunting and angling communities are seeking to influence non-hunters and invite people into the fold, we’re going to need to commit to being a truthful and knowledgeable community.
Ask these questions: Is it true? Does it invite conversation rather than division?

Beauty
While hunting and hunting culture may be true and it may be good, it doesn’t guarantee that it is beautiful.
When talking about beauty, I believe one of the best applications for the hunting community is the distribution of photography, videos, and print. There are some amazing images in the world of outdoor activities. These beautiful people, places, and animals should be celebrated! Sadly, there are also ugly images, videos, gifs, and memes distributed with little thought about who they might reach. One doesn’t have to be a prude or squeamish to be turned off by this. All it takes is to be disconnected and unfamiliar with the outdoor world.
A lot of us hunters are also anglers, so I want to borrow from that world to illustrate. Imagine explaining the use of baseball bats and machetes on bighead carp in the Illinois River to your children or an average suburbanite. How could they possibly understand this scenario without all the relevant information? The bighead carp doesn’t belong in our waters, this much is true, so using any methods necessary to remove them may make sense as a management tool to some. I don’t see it. I think it’s both an ineffective method and a confusing message. For now, in most places, it is not illegal because these fish are not protected and they truly are a nuisance. So, instead of bashing those I disagree with and calling them names, I want to ask about the impact the video or the picture will make on those who don’t understand rather than focus on the method.
The photos may have an element of truth. Club-like weapons are really how someone harvested this invasive animal. Also, it may be good to rid our waters of bighead carp! It is good to remove invasives. Is there beauty though? Is there something that draws in people rather than divides them? I believe it’s the role of responsible hunters and anglers to think about how these photos and videos might affect other people – particularly those who don’t understand the context. One of the ways to do that is to look through this lens of beauty.
Ask these questions: Is it beautiful? Does it need to be seen? Is it gratuitous and can it be taken the wrong way?

Goodness
While hunting and hunting culture may be true and it may be beautiful, it doesn’t guarantee that it is good.
When speaking about goodness in the context of hunting and outdoor activities, the main thing that comes to mind is ethics. When we talk about ethical hunting culture, we’re talking about the character of our community—what’s done when no one is looking.
This doesn’t mean talking about how ethical we are. This means doing the right thing.The reasons for taking a doe this upcoming winter may be fantastic. One may be able to honestly and clearly articulate why they did it; communicating every detail of helping with population control and wild, organic meat acquisition. One may have even broadcasted tasteful and beautiful pictures of the sunset that day, covering the exit wound expertly in their selfie, and showcasing the beauty that nature offers with tasteful angles and thoughtful words to match the post. They may also have trespassed on private property to recover the deer. And whether one gets caught in that offense, the goodness of the action is compromised.
This may seem drastic, but there are a few reasons to consider. First, one may think they have gotten away with it, but the trail cam on the landowner’s property now shows him a picture of a hunter; the unscrupulous hunter from the beginning of this article. Secondly, even if no one else knows, the offender has compromised the soul of something beautiful. They have compromised their conscience. They have compromised their character, and the bitterness will be tasted in every bite of that venison, or at least, it should.
Is there forgiveness? Of course. Are there still consequences? Probably. We must be a community that forgives the one who asks for it. That is part of the equation when we talk about goodness. But before we get to that point – the point of sorrow and repentance, it may help to ask these questions when dealing with ethical dilemma: Is it good? Is it a shortcut? Does it violate my conscience? Will it present a picture of hunters as people without character?
At the end of the day, we can’t be fully responsible for the opinions or actions of others outside our own outdoor community, but we can do our best to communicate clearly and honestly, display the beauty of our lifestyle with tasteful, inviting imagery, and hold ourselves to a higher standard in our actions. When we model these things well, we hold out a compelling invitation for others to join us. It’s a small tool in the arsenal of the modern outdoors person, but this ancient triad may lead to more of us in the field. It may help us care for the land and its inhabitants around us. Most importantly, it may enable us to do what we love, and do it well.
AC


